Dr T.E. Forster:
That's what I really look like. Here
is the portrait of me that I keep in the attic.
Office: Room 3, Ground floor, Pavilion C;
`phone in department (01223)-337981;
mobile in UK +44-7887-701-562;
mobile in NZ +64-210580093.
Here is my electronic diary.
(If you want to book an appointment you will need to contact me for the password.)
For Google's benefit I record here that my name is often misspelled `Thomas Foster' and `Thomas Forester'
Click here for Poem of the Week.
Click here for Bon Mot of the Week.
I am a Life Associate of
Clare Hall, Cambridge, (where I
am also Director of Studies in Mathematics and Computer Science) and an affiliated
lecturer in the department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
here in Cambridge. I am also Director of Studies in Pure Mathematics at
Outside Cambridge my affiliations are: Adjunct Senior Fellow in the Philosophy department at
the University of Canterbury at Christchurch;
Visiting Lecturer at Queen Mary
Westfield ; External Researcher of the Auckland Centre for Discrete
Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science in New Zealand, and a Fellow of the Center for Philosophy of Science at
the University of Pittsburgh. When I was in residence there I
stayed - as many fellows do - in Carl
Hempel's flat. The Pittsburgh Center [sic] also has conferences. (Pittsburgh has many attractions beyond its six (!) universities:
serious weather, a wonderful orchestra, opera houses, rivers, cable
cars, the best chips in America (at the
Original Hot Dog. Be sure to ask for a small portion), steel
mills, lots of history (much of it
sad), and, last but not least, an
airport called - wait for it - ``Tom Foerster International Airport''!
(The correct explanation for this spelling mistake is surely the one found by Sten Vikner who pointed out that they must have misplaced my middle initial.)
In 2014/5 I am Part III Advisor on Foundations.
I organised the 70th anniversary NF meeting (``NFUK'') in Cambridge at the end of May 2007.
I am on the Comité de Redaction of the Belgian Centre National de
Recherches de Logique;
I am a ``correspondent étranger" of
Logique et Analyse and an associate editor of The Human Nature review.
I was the Cambridge horn (in fact the Principal Researcher(!)) of
the (currently slumbering) three-horned beast that is Cameleon.
I was Conference
Director for the (now dormant) St Luke's Institute, in which
capacity I organised BILAP (Buddhism in
Logic and Analytic Philosophy) which held its inaugural meeting in
Cambridge in November 2005, and the Logic and
Rhetoric conference held in Cambridge on the last weekend of
I am on the
DPMMS Quiz team
which mercilessly crushed all opposition to be the winners in the
800th anniversary Quiz context. At the 800th anniversary garden
party we went on to murder a team of alumni. I used to have a link
to footage of that event, but that footage was never for the
squeamish and has now been made unavailable!
I have recently returned from flying the flag in the Idaho Marches in
urgent consultations with the world expert on the consistency of
NF. In Michaelmas
2014/5 I am lecturing Computability-and-Logic at Part III, and
Logic-for-Linguists for the Linguistics Faculty
I work on Set Theory, Type Theory, BQO theory, Philosophy of Mathematics and Philosophy of Mind. I developed
this last interest when I was a music+philosophy student and it led me
Neurophysiology (yes, that is me in the picture, but no logicians were harmed in the execution of this experiment)
: until relatively recently I was a paid-up member of the Electro-Physiological
Technologists Association. I had to give up
my part-time post at Addenbrooke's doing EEGs to take up my Pittsburgh
combination of an interest in Philosophy of Mind and a training in
logic has given me an abiding interest in the logic of virtual
(theoretical) entities. (Having the part of the Cheshire Cat in the
school production of Alice about the time the above photograph was
taken probably played a part too). Indeed when the Logic and
Philosophy of Science department at the University of California at
Irvine were so kind as to invite me to spend three months with
them I took the opportunity to write a book about it, called Reasoning about Theoretical Entities. Not
surprisingly, given my exposure to the Life Sciences and my interest
in reasoning about theoretical entities, I have an interest in
Philosophy of Biology. Perhaps I'll get round to giving a course on
it one day. Most of my publications concern Quine's set theory NF,
for which an introduction for a general audience can be found here (it was a 60th anniversary retrospective article
for the American Mathematical Monthly).
In Michaelmas 2014/5 I shall have Alice Vidrine here, and Peter
Koepke. In Lent Benedikt Loewe is coming, and in Easter term Randall Holmes.
In recent years I have
had Olivier Esser
here in Cambridge as my post-doc, working on NF.
Thierry Libert has been here for two visits, continuing his
project to teach me some positive set theory (GPC etc: this isn't
Set-Theory-by-Compte, despite the adjective and the French
Connection). I have recently had two visits from Edoardo Rivello, who
wants to learn about symmetric models for
stratified fragments of ZF.
teaching materials (for my Cambridge students and readable only
from .cam.ac.uk addresses);
If you want to book a supervision with me you will want to consult
. (You will need to contact me for the password)
You might find my essay on Julian Jaynes' The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind a useful resource.
If you are a Cambridge physiology student thinking of doing my Part II project have a look at the proposal. I don't think I can support it now (I am no longer at Addenbrooke's) but I think the department there would still be interested.
A Ph.D., perhaps?
The world of NF studies is being turned upside-down by the rumours
that NF has been proved consistent. Come and join the fun! NF
students in Cambridge are a small but select bunch. Curiously (like
their supervisor) they are all vegetarians, but meat-eaters need not
feel that they will be unwelcome, as long as they keep their
disgusting habits to themselves. No but seriously. At the moment there
are two: Zachiri McKenzie
has just completed, David Matthai
is now in his third year, and Philipp
Kleppmann is in his second. Well, two-and-a-half, beco's i am a co-supervisor of
Adam Lewicki .
They are enrolled in Cambridge, but
it is by no means out of the question that I will be in a position to
supervise students on a campus in New Zealand. In addition to the
obvious delights we all know about (hobbits behind every sofa etc etc)
there is also the point that NZ fees for Ph.D. students are a lot
lower than Cambridge fees!
For while i was trying to interest people in the constructions discussed
in my AMS Baltimore meeting article.
wrote a Ph.D.thesis on this subject
which he has kindly allowed me to link from here.. My hope was that these
constructions would lead to a proof of Con(NF). Even if it is true that
they have been pipped at the post, the methods used in this paper are
related to those used in the alleged proof, and it could be a good place
to start reading.
I am interested in taking on some more Ph.D. students to work on NF and
to this end I provide a list of suitable
thesis topics. Actually not all the topics in there are NF topics...
there are some topics in philosophy of mathematics that i'd be happy to
There is a plan to get some money together for a Ph.D. studentship to do
a formal verification of Holmes' proof of Con(NF). It's only at the design
stage as yet, but if you are suitably qualified it would no harm to tell me
I organise those Cameleon meetings
that take place in Cambridge. I organise the Set Theory seminar in DPMMS.
I belong to the theory group at the
My mother came from Basel, the city that produced
Leonhard Euler and Holbein and has been home to the Bernoulli family
since they were expelled by the Reyes Catolicos (isn't that enough for
a small town???). We know about the mathematicians of course, (and
even the tennis players: Roger Federer is a Basler) but it has also
produced some wonderful painters - and not just Holbein. Sadly the
creator of this little gem in the
Eulerstrasse (yes, it's the same Euler) did not sign his work and his
(her?) identity was not recorded for posterity. I tell everyone I am
a fourth-generation academic, and this is because of her (my mother's)
grandfather who was a fairly well-known chemist (he discovered the
rearrangement of allyl thiocyanate to allyl isothiocyanate)
from whom i inherited through her not only some genes for doing
chemistry but also a dressing-gown.
The only other ancestor I know of who is sufficiently well-known
to have his own wikipædia entry is
John Freke, but
I get only about 0.4% of my genes from him - which is a pity, 'cos he was an FRS!
But in any case it's intellectual ancestry one worries about.
I had two DoktorVater: Adrian Mathias in Cambridge, and
in Brussels. Sadly, Boffa died in 2001: it is a terrible loss.
Here are two group pictures, with three of his
Adrian Mathias, is still very much alive - for the moment at
least: he does live uncomfortably near an active volcano!)
According to the
Mathematics Genealogy Project I am descended (thru' Mathias)
from Fichte, Hegel, Kant and Leibniz!! Thru' Boffa I am descended from Poincaré!!
Everyone Who Is Anyone in Silicon Fen I worked (briefly) for Clive Sinclair, in my case in
Sinclair Radionics days. (He was a neighbour of my parents). My
number is 3: Forster-Truss-Shelah-Erdös ; (and Erdös many years
ago described me as ``a very strange young man''!). But there are
other metrics. My Trotsky number is 3 (I shared an office with a colleague
(Giovanna Corsi) who shared an office with a colleague
(Jean van Heijenoort) who was Trotsky's bodyguard); my Beethoven
number is 4, since I have shaken hands with a man who shook hands with
a man who shook hands with Grillparzer, who shook hands with
Beethoven, Liszt...well - everyone! I once played Garcia Lorca's
piano. I used to play chess with a woman who had been Tolstoy's
next-door neighbour, and had been taught by Alekhine
. When an infant
she had been dandled on Tchaikovsky's knee. If you are a Canadian you
may be impressed by the fact that I once had my portrait painted by Barker Fairley (he's the one with the pipe in
this group picture of the group of seven); apparently I am the only
person other than Wittgenstein to have given a course of lectures in
Cambridge gazetted under the title `Philosophy'; my Ph.D. Thesis
is the shortest on record; as far as I know I am the only
person to have a Cambridge Ph.D. in mathematics without having done
any undergraduate mathematics; finally I must surely be the only Logic
Ph.D. anywhere in the world who is also licenced to drive an EEG
machine. My remaining distinguishing features are of less
interest. Born in the oldest house in Cambridge? And a haunted one at
that? (It's the Abbey House. It
had been a gift from the first Baron Fairhaven to the Cambridge City Council who then
divided it into flats and let them out - so should I ever want to go
into politics I can always say I was born in council house! and I was
delivered by Alice
Roughton). The only person to have been at school with both the
erstwhile Home Secretary (Charles Clarke) and the Queen's (erstwhile)
private secretary (Robin Janvrin)? (Not to mention the - sadly -
Nick Drake who was in my Russian class at Marlborough). The
tabloids are not beating a path to my door. I do not - yet - have a
theorem named after me, (nor even an
airport, see above) tho' there is a lifeform bearing my name: not a
child - sadly- but a midge
called Telnatogeton Forsteri. This
lives only in New Zealand - there is a type specimen in my desk drawer in
Cambridge but it's definitely dead. This lifeform was discovered by my
friend John Leader. If you wish to name an invertebrate or a theorem - or even an airport -
after me, feel free.
I make available here the source code of my Commonplace book on NF.
I include here some material that will probably turn into something publishable (and is probably already halfway-publishable).
Cartesian-closedness fails in
NF does what it says on the tin.
Scansets shows how to use a cute new datatype to interpret various versions of Mac Lane set theory into (various versions of) KF.
Stratification mod n generalises (weakens) stratification in various systematic ways and proves a special case of the duality conjecture.
More on Church-Oswald Models is my latest thinking on this amusing topic. Lots of nice stuff. My department has the matter constantly under review.
As part of the project to make historical NF literature freely available I am posting here my Ph.D. Thesis .
I keep unbelievably exalted company....
A fairly complete bibliography of my published writings can be found
My lectures for the Part II logic course have now come out as Logic, Induction and Sets. A list of errata for this
book is to be found here.
Those works which the publishers
have allowed me to make available have links on this page.
My recent talk on the Axiom of Choice wot i gave at Young Researchers in Mathematics 2014
will probably go through a few more metamorphoses before i attempt to publish it, so i am not going to post the pdf here. If you want to see the current version feel free to email me and i will send you a heavily embargoed copy. I shall expect feedback! Already in print is The Axiom of Choice and inference to the Best Explanation which has recently appeared in Logique et Analyse. The Warwick talk is a much expanded version of this paper
There are three translations available:
My annotated translation of Coret's seminal article
Les cas stratifiées du schema de remplacement and
my annotated translation of Roland Hinnion's Ph.D. thesis are both
Dualität is an annotated and illustrated translation of Specker's seminal
paper on duality in projective geometry, which I prepared in collaboration with Anne the widow of Harold Davenport. I prepared it for the
Garland Quinefest volumes, where it finds a natural place because of
the development of those ideas of duality into ideas of typical
ambiguity in Type theory and NF. I have removed from this copy a typo that mars the Garland version. Chad Brown reckons there is a mistake in the original. Click here for his analysis.
Permutation Models and Stratified Formulæ, a Preservation Theorem appeared in the ZML vol 36 (1990) pp 385–388.
Asenjo's system LP does not support modus ponens has
been much expanded by Jc Beall into a version which has been accepted by the NDJFL
and which includes a striking strengthening of my result by Jeremy Seligman. The
version posted here is essentially my original text.
A semantic characterisation of the
well-typed formulae of lambda calculus is from Theoretical
Asynchronous games explores a way of representing asynchonous
games (Homicidal Chauffeur etc.) as alternating discrete (``clocked'')
games. I would be interested in feedback. It has now appeared in the
procedings of the Liverpool july 2004 meeting on knowledge and games,
but the version here will always be the more up-to-date one.
editors are allowing me to post here my introduction to the Buddhism in Logic and Analytical Philosophy
volume (``Pointing at the moon'') published by Oxford University
Relaxing Stratification is an answer to the top FAQ about NF: ``Can the stratification constraint be safely relaxed?''. Beginners might find this paper discouragingly thorough! It is a survey, joint work by me and Olivier Esser.
Paris-Harrington in an NF
context exhibits a formulation of Paris-Harrington and one of
Finite Ramsey that differ only in their quantifier prefix. It also
discusses the implications of the fact that - on the face of it - the
statement of the Paris-Harrington theorem is not stratified/welltyped
in the Russell-Quine sense. It has appeared in volume 17 of the
Cahiers du Centre de Logique.
Rhetorical devices in Analytic Philosophy
is my contribution to the special number of Logique et
Analyse which contains the proceedings of the Logic and Rhetoric conference held in Cambridge on
the last weekend of October 2006.
My talk at the LMS
Games played on an
illfounded membership relation has now appeared in the Boffa 60th
Finite-to-one maps has now appeared
in the JSL. It shows, without any use of AC, that if there is a
finite-to-one surjection from the power set of X to X then X is
genuinely finite (its cardinal is a natural number). I proved it years
ago and tho'rt nothing of it but Adrian Mathias and James Cummings
couldn't prove it when I challenged them so I tho'rt it might be worth
publishing and the JSL agreed, bless `em. Greg Kirmayer claims that
he can improve this result, and i'm inclined to believe him.
Yablo's paradox without self-reference
is in Logique et Analyse 185-8 (2004) pp 461-2;
Yablo's paradox and the
omitting types theorem for propositional logic is in
Logique et Analyse 54 No.215 (2011). The version linked here
(unlike the published version) contains a proof of the extended
omitting types theorem for propositional logic. I cannot find a
proof in the literature, and there should be one!
Deterministic and Nondeterministic Strategies
for Hintikka games in First-order and Branching-quantifier logic
is in Logique et Analyse vol 195 pp 265-69.
Implementing Mathematical objects in Set Theory
is in the special number of Logique et
Analyse devoted to Foundations of Set Theory, to wit vol 50 No.197 (2007).
AC fails in the natural analogues of V and L
that model the stratified fragment of ZF is a version (cleaned of
typos and minor infelicities) of the paper I gave at the Baltimore
joint meeting AMS/MAA in 2003. It is a work of breathtaking fertility:
read it and weep. Better still, read it and use the techniques in it to
Every set is the same size as a wellfounded set is in the March 2003 fascicule of the JSL;
BQOs and coinduction is in the dec. 2003 fascicule of Theoretical Computer Science;
The Modal Aether (wherein the egregious and vexatious errors of the possible world semanticists are expos'd, ridicul'd and confuted) is
in a collection called `Intentionality' edited by Reinhardt Kahle and
published by Springer. That was in .ps format;
here it is in pdf format but without the drawings.
Weak Set Theories related to HOL is an
improved version of my HUG 1994 paper from LNCS 859;
Why Set theory without the axiom of foundation? appeared in the Journal of Logic and Computation in 1994;
Sethood and Situations
(jointly written with Cathy Rood Wyss) has appeared in Computational Linguistics 22, (1996) pp 405-408.
Permutations and Wellfoundedness: the true
meaning of the Bizarre Arithmetic of Quine's NF is in the JSL
71 march 2006 pp 227-240.
Set Theory with a Universal Set is a revision and expansion of the
last chapter of my book on set theory with a universal set, and
supercedes it. It was written for the Alonzo Church festschrift.
is intended to be a comprehensive introduction to the method developed
by Church and Oswald to construct models of theories like Church's.
(The version here is to be preferred to the version in print, as I remove
typos and mathematical errors from it as they come to my notice.) A more
philosophical treatment of the same ideas is to be found in
The Iterative Conception of Set. Everyone who is anyone has written an
article under that title; what is distinctive about my contribution under
this title is that it was voted one of the ten best philosophy articles of
2008 by the Philosophers' Annual. Currently unpublished is
More on Church-Oswald Models, my latest
thinking on this amusing topic. Lots of nice stuff. My department has the matter constantly under review.
Sharvy's Lucy and Benjamin Puzzle is
included here with the permission of Springer, since I gave them the
copyright so it could appear in Studia Logica, 90 (2008) pp
The organisers of the Riga conference on paradoxes have allowed me to
post here this brief Note on Paradoxes
in Ethics which will appear in their proceedings.
Erdos-Rado without Choice has appeared in the Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol 72, 2007, pp. 897-900. The version linked here
contains some informative comments by a referee which readers will
find very helpful; I am grateful to him/her for permission to include
Mathematical entities arising from equivalence relations, and their implementation in Quine's NF is my invited talk at the Munich workshop organised by Roy Cook and Erich Reck, and is due to appear in Philosophia Mathematica.
Three extended reviews are here:
(i) My Computer
Journal review of Barwise and Moss's Vicious
Circles. Readers of that review - and others with an antiquarian
interest in the early literature on funny set theories - may want to
see my 1982 paper on
(ii) my Studia Logica review of
Ziegler-Booth's edition of the collected set-theoretic writings of Paul Finsler, and
(iii) my Physis
review of From Dedekind to
Here are the notes for my contribution to the panel discussion organised by the Trinity Mathematical Society on 21/x/2013 with Imre Leader on Does mathematics need a philosophy? and
here are my notes for my talk to the TMS in october 2012.
recorded this talk
i gave at Heriot-Watt.
In my pathetically few hours of leisure I try to keep my knitting going, and strive to keep up my interest in
Astronomy and Politics
....and, of course, neurology (this .gif file is called Louise's Brain): [a wee exercise for the reader: join up the top-and-bottom, and join up the sides, and email me to tell me which surface Louise's brain is drawn on]
DPMMS front page.